When The Real Popes Came To Power
(Roman Piso, 06-20-2018)
[French: ‘Quand les vrais papes sont arrivés au pouvoir’] [Hebrew: ‘כאשר האפיפיורים האמיתיים הגיעו לשלטון ‘] [Spanish: ‘Cuando los verdaderos papas llegaron al poder’] [Norwegian: ‘Når den virkelige pavene kom til makten’] [Portuguese: ‘Quando os verdadeiros papas chegaram ao poder’] [German: ‘Als die echten Päpste an die Macht kamen’] [Italian: ‘Quando i veri Papi giunsero al potere’]
This paper picks up where some of my other papers left off. That is, it is a supplement. And yet, it also serves as an overview. To better understand this paper, please read my other papers regarding the ancient royal oligarchy and the creation of religion by ancient royals (particularly, those regarding the creation of Christianity).
I’ve written several papers on the subject of the popes (at this time, about 35). If you are familiar with the work that I have done, then you should know that I have given the genealogies of various popes which were previously unavailable to, and unknown to the general public; and that includes academia. The work that was done in this and other related areas is of great importance as it is what is required in order to get at the truth and true nature of so many things in ancient history.
My work, and that of others who have studied ancient history as it should be studied, has exposed the true nature ancient history. And it is only by studying it in the correct context that we will ever be able to understand it as it should be understood. This is essential. [a]
What our work has exposed is that history was written from within a closed or controlled environment in which only certain royals were allowed to write. That meant that all that was being written was controlled by royals, and that the illusion that anyone could write for publication was a created facade; one that was deliberately created and maintained by successive lines of royalty. [b]
In other papers, I’ve given information on popes (as I had just said above), including the first ten popes (or bishops of Rome). Though to the public, the term ‘pope’ or ‘papa’ was not used for the popes until the 3rd Century CE, within the family who had created it itself, the term was being used. Since Christianity was created by certain Romans, and the way in which royalty operated was to keep power and control as close to the main royal family as possible, the same was true of those who were of this new branch of royalty stemming from the creation of the then new religion – Christianity.
When one examines just who the first ten popes really were, they see how they were all related to each other. The papal power, like that of the emperors, was kept close to the ruling family. When Christianity was first being established, the knowledge of, and truth about, the creation of Christianity, as well as the authority and hierarchy was kept close to the source of that religion (the family that created it). [c]
As time went on, the family developed branches or lines of descent that spread out to newly created royal and papal ‘dynasties’. And it is because of this, and the fact that those who had held those titles and positions wanted future generations to know who they were, that we are now able to find that information. They could not be obvious about who they were, as they did not want people outside their own families to know that during their own lifetime (we must always remember this). I’ve written more about this in other papers (see my papers on ‘The Royal Language’ and ‘Royal Supremacy’). [d]
Now, in other papers, I’ve also written about how the authors of the New Testament were Romans and how, under the emperor Tiberius, a committee to create a new religion was established at the city of Tiberias, in Galilee. I’ve also written about why that committee had been established. It was because the Herodians had asked Rome for help to get back the power and authority that the Sadducees (a sect of the Jews) once had in Judea. [e]
Over time, the Pharisees (another sect of the Jews, and an opposing one to the Sadducean sect) had gained control of the Temple and had more power and influence in Judea, than that of the leaders of the Sadducees; and the Herodians were the leaders of that sect (Sadducees), having taken that position from the former leaders of the Sadducees, the Hasmoneans. In reality, the Herodians were actually just another branch of the Hasmoneans (see my work on that also, such as ‘King Herod Was A Hasmonean’). [f]
The new religion that was to be created was one in which the hard line rulers wanted to promote certain things that they wanted to remain in place; slavery, ignorance and superstition of the masses, and they wanted to keep the form of government which allowed royals to retain their powerful positions. That is, they wanted this new religion to be (and reinforce), everything that was the opposite of what the Pharisees were promoting and fighting for. The Pharisees were trying to better educate the masses, they were trying to get basic human rights for the general public, they were trying to put an end to slavery, and they wanted a new democratic form of government. Many royals did not want that.
This fight among the sects of Jews had been a long one (from about 135 BCE/BC through 135 CE/AD). Though there are scant records that one may consult for info on that war before that time, it appears to me that that war was actually a long time in coming as well. And, long before the Herodians had asked Rome for help, the Hasmoneans had. [g]
This split within Judaism was not a simple disagreement. It had been an actual war; one that was hidden from history. One which was disguised by the royals who were writing history of the time. In the histories written by the Romans, it was divided up and called ‘revolt’. And that is still how many so-called scholars today think of it; as if these were only scattered ‘revolts’ instead of the actual all-out war that it was. [h]
The Pharisees, who were fighting for basic human rights for all, an end to slavery, and a new, fair government were fighting a war against all of the royals who had opposed them. And, as a result, the winners of that war, were the ones who were writing about it in their histories. And they chose to call the good guys, ‘religious zealots’ and other things, painting them as the ‘bad guys’, even as ‘robbers’.
The reason the royals who were against the Pharisees felt justified in calling them ‘robbers’ is because the Pharisees wanted to take away those things which the royals had enjoyed at the expense of everyone else. This was the true source for the story of ‘Robin Hood’, as the Pharisees did truly want to ‘rob’ from the rich, and give to the poor.
The Pharisees were in fact, not promoting religion, they were trying to wean the public off of it by teaching ethics instead. The proof of that is found in the Talmud, which was being written by the Pharisees and the other sect that played a supporting role for the Pharisees, a sect that became known as the Scribes (see my other work for more information about the Jewish sects). However, since the Pharisees were subjects of Rome, they had to at least “appear” to be a religion in order to exist.
Anyway, I think that with at least this much knowledge of how and why Christianity was being created, you can understand why the fraud had been perpetrated in the first place. Yes, greed had played an important part. But, it was the royal lifestyle and the continuation of royal rule that was at stake for the royals who were opposed to what the Pharisees were doing and promoting.
And that is why so many royals were on the side of those who wanted to protect that royal lifestyle, and why, eventually, those ‘Axis’ royals, won the war. In my work, such as in the book ‘Piso Christ’, the Pharisees and those who had helped them are referred to as the ‘Allies’, while those who took the side of their enemies, are referred to as the ‘Axis’. That is because we already have reference to those terms used in the same way for those opposing powers of WWII.
One of the things that those who were creating and promoting Christianity did was to backdate the stories that they were writing in the New Testament to a time earlier than the time in which they were writing it. There were several reasons for that. One reason was to throw off those who would try to discover just who the actual authors were; as they would then think to look at those who were writing in that earlier time, instead of when the authors were actually writing. Good trick. And it worked for a long time.
The Roman creators of the New Testament put a lot of work into it, but they were also having a great deal of fun doing so. They wrote inside jokes and puns into the NT; and they used it as a way to mock and belittle their enemies – the Pharisees (see my work and that of Abelard Reuchlin for more on that subject). While the Roman authors of the NT were mocking the Pharisees, the Pharisees and Scribes were witnesses to the creation of Christianity and they were giving info about those who were creating it, in the Talmud. [i]
Since Arrius Piso’s son, Julius Piso, did not approve of what his father was doing by creating and promoting Christianity, he asked his father if he could write the ending of the NT stories; and his father agreed. Thus, it was Julius Piso, who authored The Revelation. This is something which both Julius Piso and the Pharisees had in common.
And, this is why the Pharisees chose to write what they did, as they did, so that their information about the creation of the NT in the Talmud, would agree with and match much of what Julius Piso had put into The Revelation. In The Revelation, Julius Piso gave a lot of info about who is father was, and his connection to the creation of Christianity. But both, Julius Piso and the Pharisees could not state things outright. What they could do was give that info in the Royal Language. And, that meant using various literary devices which were a part of the Royal Language, such as using words to give names.
Another reason that the Roman authors of the New Testament wanted to backdate their NT stories was so that the illusions that they were creating in the NT would better be believed, such as things that they would ‘predict’ (or foretell) would happen, would appear, to have come true; when in fact, those things had already happened (such as the destruction of the Temple). Another nice trick.
Getting a new religion off the ground is no easy task, even for wealthy royals. As I had already stated in other papers, Christianity was being created and promoted by certain royal Romans. And they were descendants of other ancient royals who had previously created and promoted other religions long before their time.
So, they knew how to do it and they knew that the establishment of a new religion would take a very long time; in fact, several generations. So, they did not expect it to flourish right away; and in fact, it did not. Despite all of their efforts, Christianity actually fizzled out even before the last books of the New Testament were written. It basically died when its main authors had died, and that was around 117/118 CE/AD. What kept it ‘alive’ even though it was actually dead, was the efforts of family members who wrote as if it were still alive; another created illusion (see my work on the various illusions that were created by ancient royals).
Thus, the title of bishop of Rome or ‘Pope’ was at the time, a kind of honorary title or position. In reality, it was something given in name only, as no Christian church actually existed once the religion had failed during the first part of the second century. Again, despite the fact that there was no longer any actual Christian churches, family members kept the religion ‘alive’ by writing as if it were still active, and they even made it appear that it was thriving! [j]
And the reason that they had done this was because they were ‘saving’ it so that it could be revived at a later date when their problems with the Jews (Pharisees) had been taken care of and when a better infrastructure could be designed and put into place. It was a plan that required time and much preparation.
A dynamic ‘history’ for the Church had to be created and ‘established’ within the minds of those who they had hoped would become believers and members of the Church once they were able to get it off the ground. So, the family and their descendants wrote of Christian martyrs and of Christian persecutions, which never happened. And to entertain themselves while they were doing this, they used those writings to pass inside jokes to each other and to secretly identify just who they and their ancestors were, through the use of the royal language.
Remember, royals were in charge and control of all that was being written. And that means that those who were of royal blood were also those who were writing the histories, both Church and otherwise. And, they were also those who had written the biblical texts. But the reason that they were able to get away with it was because of the key illusions that they had created to throw researchers off. [k]
One of those, as I may have stated earlier, was the illusion that anyone could write for publication. Another was the illusion that many people were writing, when in fact, there were relatively few. How was this accomplished? It was something that royals had already been doing for thousands of years, using aliases and pen names. The true nature, that is, the true context, of ancient history will never be revealed to those who will not accept the fact that ancient authors used aliases and pen names. That is key, that is essential to know and understand. [l]
The early Church and the first ten bishops of Rome. I’ve listed these in another paper some time ago. But for this paper, it bears repeating. Here is the list:
[I] St. Peter (aka Arrius Calpurnius Piso)
[II] St. Linus (aka Pliny The Younger)
[III] St. Cletus (aka Alexander C. Piso I)
[IV] St. Clement I (aka Julius Calpurnius Piso)
[V] St. Aristus (aka Proculus C. Piso)
[VI] St. Alexander I (aka Alexander C. Piso II)
[VII] St. Sixtus I (aka Justus Calpurnius Piso)
[VIII] St. Telesphorus (aka Flavius Arrianus)
[IX] St. Hyginus (aka Silanus C. Piso)
[X] St. Pius I (aka Emperor Antoninus Pius)
Now, remember what I said about how at the beginning of the creation & promotion of a new religion, such as Christianity, only close family members of those who started it were trusted with high positions within that religion. And, that at the beginning of it, the family nucleus had not spread out to form branches; or, those who were of this initial group would themselves be the founders of those branches which would later take over as heads of the religion.
Here is the relationship of these first ten bishops of Rome. Arrius Calpurnius Piso was the main founder of the religion, and thus, was the first bishop of Rome. Pliny The Younger was his partner. Together, we may think of these two as a type of ‘dynamic duo’. Pliny The Younger was Arrius Piso’s younger foster brother, which I have explained in previous writings.
Alexander C. Piso I, was son of Arrius Calpurnius Piso. He died circa 95 CE/AD. He was probably killed in an attempt to assassinate emperor Domitian. Julius Calpurnius Piso was another son of Arrius Calpurnius Piso. I could detail a lot of information about each of these individuals, but I have already done that in other papers.
Proculus C. Piso was yet another son of Arrius Calpurnius Piso. His mother was Berenice, queen of Judea (who ruled along with her brother, Agrippa II). Now, I haven’t officially said this before, and I am not doing so here; but this Berenice, instead of being that sister of King Agrippa II, may have been daughter of that Berenice. More study will have to be done to make a further determination with regards to that issue.
Alexander C. Piso II, was son of Alexander C. Piso I. And thus, Alexander C. Piso II, was a grandson of Arrius Calpurnius Piso. Justus Calpurnius Piso was another son of Arrius Calpurnius Piso. Flavius Arrianus, was another grandson of Arrius Calpurnius Piso, via his daughter Claudia Phoebe, who was aka Pompeia Plotina, wife of the Emperor Trajan. Silanus C. Piso was a son of Proculus C. Piso, and thus, was another grandson of Arrius Calpurnius Piso. Emperor Antoninus Pius, was brother of Flavius Arrianus, and thus, also a grandson of Arrius Calpurnius Piso via his daughter Claudia Phoebe.
So that shows you how close all of these first ten bishops of Rome were. They did not allow any power or control of or in the early Church into the hands of anyone outside of their immediate family. And, it was these early creators and promoters of Christianity who were also writing as the first of the early Church Fathers. I’d detail that for you here, but like many other things, I have already done so in my other papers and other works. [m]
Now, as I had said, the early Church had failed. It died out. How long did it last? The family had gotten permission from Vespasian to create Christianity, and actually work on perfecting it and to promote it. So, during his reign, the gospels of Mark and Matthew were written and finished. When Vespasian died, his son Titus became emperor, and he too, allowed the Piso family to work on Christianity.
However, when Titus died, his brother Domitian took over as Emperor of the Roman Empire; and he not only would not allow the Pisos to work on Christianity, he banished them from Rome. All of the main family members were gone from Rome – except for Pliny The Younger. For some reason, Domitian liked Pliny. And, he evidently thought that Pliny also liked him. He must not have considered Pliny to have been a part of the immediate Piso family; probably because he was brought into the family by his adoptive father (Lucius Calpurnius Piso) who married the widowed Arria The Younger (thus, making Pliny The Younger, Arrius Piso’s younger foster brother).
So, there were not any churches in the Roman Empire under Domitian, and their probably were not any built before then either, as there were only two gospels finished at that time (i.e., Mark and Matthew). So, the family would have to wait until they could get rid of Domitian and put another emperor in who would be allow them to continue creating and promoting Christianity.
One of Arrius Piso’s sons, Alexander Piso I, appears to have tried to assassinate Domitian, and instead, being caught before he could, died in about the year 95 CE/AD. Well, that and other attempts on his life, caused Domitian to be even more cautious. Having failed in the attempt, others were planned.
There was another attempt on Domitian’s life, in which another of Arrius Piso’s sons would try, but he failed and was saved by another of his sons. Finally, with the help of Domitian’s wife, Domitia, his chamberlain and the Praetorian Prefect, he was assassinated in 96 CE/AD. It appears that in some way, Pliny The Younger too, was instrumental in his assassination. As the family, in certain writings, appears to honor or congratulate Pliny in association with Domitian.
Once the family had gotten rid of Domitian, they had already planned on who they wanted to replace him, and installed Nerva as Emperor. Thereupon, Nerva recalled the Pisos back to Rome. Nerva was elderly, which is one of the factors for choosing him. He may have also had a terminal disease, giving them the guarantee that he would not be ruling for long. They mainly wanted Trajan, a relative of Nerva, as Emperor. Which, was accomplished when Nerva died in 98 CE.
At that point, the family was busy working to finish the NT books and to create churches. About the year 100 CE/AD, Pliny The Younger went throughout the Roman Empire turning certain pagan altars into churches. While doing that, he was writing, and he was also shoring up Roman cities where vice was offered (such as prostitution and gambling). He in fact, would ‘advertise’ those cities by writing about them as the NT Paul.
So, the first of the Christian churches were built on a shoestring, by refurbishing old pagan altars. Some, were torn down and reconstructed. They were constructed in the same way as other places of worship and sacrifice had been constructed in the past; particularly, those whose religion or beliefs were a front for orgies and sexual depravity. That is, they had little “sex rooms” built into the sides.
Originally, the Christian (biblical) texts were written for duel purpose. One was to appear to be straight-laced and upright; and the other was to be sexual stimulating. It depended upon the person reading those texts in the original language, and whether or not they wanted to read it one way or the other – as long as the person reading it understood the Royal Language.
Their first attempts at getting people to join their churches was probably geared towards making believers think that if they believed, they would be somehow better than other people, and perhaps get a reward for their belief, etc. However, this approach just was not getting results. People were not going to the churches, and they were not giving enough to the churches to make them profitable.
The family had to figure out a way to help keep the churches up and running and still bring in a good profit. That is when they switched to plan B. They turned the churches into brothels, with the appearance of being a religion. This was nothing new, even the Temple in Jerusalem was doing this; as well as a number of other early religions. All of this was happening between the year 100 and 118 CE/AD. When the people of the cites in which the early churches were, found out that they were brothels, they ran them out of town. And thus, Christianity had fizzled out.
The family had gotten away with there not being an actual Pope in Rome for so long that none of the family members wanted to do that. Remember, none of them actually believed the things that they were writing about, as they knew it was all fiction. Any of them who would act as an actual pope or bishop of Rome, would have no real power and no real function when there were no churches or believers.
Those who have studied history have wondered why there is a written Church history, and Church Fathers writing, but there was so many other things missing between the early second century and the time of Constantine. This explains that. Descendants of the original Piso family members wrote as Church Fathers, and had taken the title of ‘bishop of Rome’ or Pope, as well as the position of Emperor.
They had just been writing ‘serials’ or a type of adventure story of and about popes and martyrs for hundreds of years, giving various family members the title of bishop of Rome or Pope. And, they sometimes did this in the same way that they had appointed emperors at times, via councils, and by choosing the one who either wanted the title most, and/or the one who worked either most or best to promote Christianity, and/or someone who didn’t have long to live (that is, a family member who was pro-Christianity, but who had a terminal illness). And this was done so that they would only have the title for a short time.
But those who had the title knew that they would have a place in history. And thus, in this way, they would continue to “live on” after their death. To many ancient royals, this was the only real way that they had in which to “live forever”. An option that was not available to non-royals.
It had not been a priority of mine or even of my fellow researchers (of the true nature of ancient history), to determine just which of the popes had become the first to be a real, actual Pope, with ritual duties and who would run the various churches from Rome for the first time. However, I think that we can systematically narrow it down and finally find out just who that individual was.
Knowing what I and others now know, we can narrow that down to someone after Emperor Constantine I, had become Emperor. And, it probably took a while before actual churches were built and they began to have enough members to them pay. One thing is certain, it did not happen until Christianity had established real churches.
But even while churches were being built and established, the same problem that Arrius Piso and Pliny The Younger had back in their day, still existed. The problem of witnesses and evidence that could expose Christianity as a fraud – the Jews and their Talmud. So, those royal Romans who were descendants of Arrius Piso and Pliny The Younger, who inherited their works and who were trying to start of the Church again, needed to find a “solution” to what could easily destroy their hard work.
This is why they set out to find a viable plan to rid themselves of the Jews, who no longer lived within Roman territory, but who mainly lived in relative safety, being protected and given sanctuary by the rulers of Persia. Where, the Jews had continued writing the Talmud – and producing many more copies of it. This was a threat to those who were planning to profit from Christianity.
They knew that they had been able to wipe out most of the Jews in earlier attempts, and that they had succeeded in expelling them from the Roman Empire. But now that most of the surviving Jews were now located beyond Rome’s reach, they had to think of some other way. Since they, themselves, could not reach the Jews to destroy them, they had planned to get the Arabs to do it for them.
And the answer to that was to create yet another religion that would instruct the Arabs to be friendly to Christians, and yet, desire to kill the Jews. It took a long time after the time of Constantine to create that new religion and to implement it, but they managed to do this by creating Islam.
Just as the Romans made Christianity appear to have been a branch of Judaism, thus, making it appear to have nothing to do with them, they made Islam appear to be an entirely original Arab religion. And, it worked, at first. And then, it backfired.
This plan, was the real reason why, beginning with Constantine, Constantinople and other cities in the Eastern part of the Roman Empire were being fortified and expanded. One is that they needed to be able to introduce the religion of Islam to parts of the Arab world, so that it could catch on. And, since it was originally geared to get the Arabs to kill the Jews, they wanted Roman troops to be stationed in places close to Persia – so that if asked to help with the extermination of the Jews, the Romans could “help” the Arabs with that.
Tracing the history of Islam, that is, its beginnings is very complex (but, remember, uncovering the truth about Christianity was no easy task either… yet that has been done). However, we can trace the earliest introduction of Islam back to Syria, which was a Roman held country. There had to be a well orchestrated plan in order to get this religion into Persia and to get it off the ground. They had to make it appear to be something genuinely Arab. They probably had sympathizers installed in various positions of authority within certain places in Persia.
Now we must remember that Rome held many areas which were close to the Arab world at the time, including Egypt to the South, all the way up to Syria in the North. And Constantinople was a key area as well for several reasons. This was a strategic move on the part of the royal Roman oligarchy, to fortify the Eastern territories of the Roman Empire. And, just as it had taken a very long time for Christianity to be established, and the Roman royals knew that, they had worked to try and expedite the establishment of Islam.
Just as the NT character ‘Jesus’ was a created composite character, so it appears that Mohammad was likewise a created character. And, just as behind the character of Jesus, there was a real person (Arrius Piso), so also, there was probably a real person who was called ‘Mohammad’; and just to make the illusion complete, this Mohammad was given a family tree – and even has recorded descendants!
But, like I said, the original idea for Islam was for it to make the Arabs want to kill the Jews, while still being friendly to the Christians. However, the rulers in the East were not stupid. And they began to change the religion into one that they wanted. Which is why instead of all of the Jews being destroyed, the Arabs, via Islam, began to fight Christians. And the only real way that the royal Romans and leaders of the Christian Church could make any real use of it was as an excuse to have ‘Crusades’.
During the late 700’s and 800’s, various treaties were established between the Roman royals, Church leaders and the leaders of the Jews. This allowed Jews from the East to come back to parts of the Roman Empire. This too, was a plan to get the Jews to move back into Roman territory so that they could be more easily accessed (to kill). So, many did, especially since at first, Islam was creating a dangerous environment for them in Persia. [n]
This is how certain Jewish towns, villages and cities came to be established within the Holy Roman Empire. So, for about 200 years, or so, many Jews moved into the areas to the East of Rome, but which were still within Rome’s reach. That is when the idea of the Crusades was put into use.
With the objective of the Crusades ostensibly being the recovery of the holy land from the Arabs, the Crusades were directed to go through certain towns, villages and cites, which just happened to be primarily Jewish. And in which the crusaders were instructed to pillage, plunder, rape and kill the inhabitants of those places along the way to Jerusalem; as well as on the way back. The crusaders were instructed to bring back all that they had plundered and to destroy as much as they could; often leaving those places that they had visited, raised to the ground.
It was during the time of the Crusades and the Inquisitions that most of the copies of the Talmud within the Holy Roman Empire were destroyed. And this, of course, before the invention of the printing press. It was also a time in which most of the ‘Inner-Circle’ scholars within Judaism were killed. And, thus, the knowledge of what was contained within the Talmud was lost to most of the surviving Jews.
To verify this, we must also verify that factual existence of a royal oligarchy. In what way might we do that? One way is via DNA evidence. Of course, that evidence must be collected. And that, in itself, may prove difficult. Why? Because what we would need evidence of, and access to, is of various popes (their physical remains), and the Vatican has province over such evidence. That is, many of those whom we would need to get samples of DNA from, might not be granted to anyone, if the Roman Catholic Church has a say in it.
Such evidence, I contend, belongs to Humanity and not to a group or power of any kind, when the future of all mankind is weighed in the balance. Now, let’s say we can obtain that evidence. Then what? One of the first things that would give us validation is that two or more individual who were not supposed to be related, are found to be related.
Another thing that we have found in examining this ancient fraud is that alias names and pen names were often used. This was done by those ancient royals who did the writing, and aliases were also used to hide the true identities of those being written about. Rulers, and their families, for example, were being written about via aliases. And popes, we know, chose a different name for themselves as pope (a papal name). And, though this appeared on the surface to have no real rhyme or reason, other than a story given by popes themselves (such as they chose a name of an earlier pope that they had admired).
Was there a real reason for the names that they chose? Maybe not always, but in many instances, I have found that the names chosen by popes were names which their ancestors, who were also popes, had used. Interesting, certainly. But it is even more telling, than simply something of interest. It is evidence that certain branches of families held power within the Roman Catholic Church and shared that power with only certain other branches.
And, they had shared common ancestry. What does that mean? It means that if this is what was happening, that these popes were well aware of their mutual ancestry, and that the only way that this would have been allowed within the Roman Empire or the Holy Roman Empire was if the rulers allowed it. Meaning that they too, must have known that all these popes were related to each other and had the same common ancestry. And even more astounding is that the popes shared the same common ancestry with those Emperors as well. Thus, we must test family lines and individual popes and other rulers, such as emperors and/or their family members. And, we need to take this line of study back as far as we can.
My studies, as well as that of others, have given us the ability to trace these individuals back and connect their families via genealogy. And this is because they left us records that allow us to do that. They could not do this in an obvious way, of course. The reason? They would have been found out during their own lifetime and would have been swiftly over thrown. All of the things that they did, were things that they had to do in order to keep the system (crafted by their ancient ancestors) going.
Related Papers & Other Info:
[a] The true context of ancient history: The Royal Oligarchy. (See ‘l’, Aliases & Pen Names)
[b] Royal-created Illusions & Facades: Royal Supremacy. (Also see ‘d’)
To truly understand those ancient texts, one would have to read those texts with the same knowledge that the authors themselves had; and that means examining those texts with a complete knowledge of the people, places and events of the time, in the original languages, from the earliest known examples.
How & Why Ancient Royalty Created Facades & Illusions
[The Effective Creation of an Alternate Version of Reality]
[c] The exception being those who had been fighting those who were creating Christianity, two sects of the Jews, who were trying to help create a new, and better world; The Pharisees & Scribes. More papers will be written to further illustrate the long war and the part that these sects had played in that war. (Ref. ‘The Synthesis of Christianity’, Roman Piso)
[d] The Royal Language & Royal Supremacy.
A Few Words About The Royal Language
Royal Supremacy: When The World Lacked Freedom
[e] The Roman Royal Committee to establish a new religion under Tiberius. Committee disbanded sometime after the death of Tiberius, members returned to Rome (including Seneca The Rhetorician aka ‘The Younger’, and Lucius Calpurnius Piso, etc.). Nero opposed the creation of a new Roman religion. Those royal Romans who wanted the new religion then tried to kill Nero, and eventually, succeeded. And, of course, since they had ‘won’ against Nero (and others who were against the creation and promotion of Christianity, such as the Pharisees), those who wrote history with regards to Nero, painted him as a bad guy. See my works where I have sorted out who was on what side of the war, by giving them the designation ‘Ally’ or ‘Axis’ (such as in ‘Piso Christ’ and ‘The Synthesis of Christianity’).
[f] King Herod was a Hasmonean. The way that ancient authors gave such information was by scattering it (deliberately), so as to best hide it in plain sight. The information about King Herod as a descendant of Eleazar Auran, is given in the works of Flavius Josephus.
King Herod Was A Hasmonean
[g] The Hasmoneans asked Rome for help just prior to (and during) the rise of Julius Caesar as Dictator. This was because the Pharisees had become very popular with the masses and had gained control of Judea; being then, more powerful and wealthy than the Hasmonean rulers.
[h] Arrius Calpurnius Piso, writing as Flavius Josephus, includes such ‘revolts’ in his ‘Wars Of The Jews’ to hint at the fact that they were indeed, fighting a war and he also gives important key evidence and information in his writings; while, at the same time, disguising the truth in those same writings.
[i] Inside Jokes & Puns written into the New Testament.
Sick & Dirty Jokes In The New Testament
Human Dung Jokes In The NT
New Testament Joke: ‘The Lump’
[j] See Abelard Reuchlin’s ‘The True Authorship of the New Testament’ (Second Printing, 1986).
[k] Royals maintained control over all that was written for publication. Anyone who attempted to write for an audience who was not royal, and discovered, was put to death. Also, only wealthy and powerful royals could build and maintain Scriptorium. And, they had trained slave scribes whose lives were used only for the service they could provide within the royal publishing houses. They also had to have levels of ‘security’ and editing; and ways to make certain that those scribes would not be able to alter what they were writing. Those who were caught trying to alter texts were either put to death or made use of in some other way.
[l] Aliases & Pen Names. These two papers will further illustrate the use of aliases & pen names by ancient royalty:
The True Context Of Ancient History & The Gordian Emperors
Ancient Alias Names List (2017)
[m] In addition to listing the first ten bishops of Rome, this list is of some of the Roman Emperors who were descendants of that main creator of Christianity (Arrius Calpurnius Piso), and who also held title of bishop of Rome (or Pope) and/or who wrote as Church Fathers.
List of Roman Emperors who were also Popes, Xian Writers and/or Church Fathers
(Roman Piso, 06-15-2018; edited, 4 more added, 07-01-2018)
[I] Emperor Antoninus Pius (R. 138-161 CE; aka Pope Pius I)
[II] Emperor Marcus Aurelius (R. 161-180 CE; aka Pope Soter)
[III] Emperor Septimius Severus (R. 193-211 CE; aka Church Father Tertullian)
[IV] Emperor Maximinus I (R. 235-238 CE; aka Pope Pontianus)
[V] Emperor Maximus (son of Emp. Maximinus I, R. 235-238 CE; aka Pope Anterius)
[VI] Emperor Macrianus I [Senior] (R. 259-260/261 CE/AD, aka St. Cyprian)
[VII] Emperor Probus (b. 232, R. 276-282, d. 282 CE/AD, aka Church Father Malchion)
[VIII] Emperor Allectus (R. 293-296 CE; aka Pope Caius)
[IX] Emperor Constantius Chlorus (R. 305-306 CE; aka Pope Eusebius)
[X] Emperor Constantine I (R. 307-337 CE; aka Pope Melchiades)
[XI] Emperor Procopius (R. 365-366 CE; aka Pope Liberius)
[XII] Emperor Valens (b. 328, R. 364-378, d. 378 CE/AD, aka St. Basil)
[XIII] Emperor Honorius (b. 384, R. 395-423 CE/AD, aka St. Augustine)
Note: There were also secret co-emperors. Those are not listed here. And, within my private notes, I have much more information about emperors and their family as popes. All that was being done in the Roman Empire with the creation of ‘Emperors’ was that instead of there having been two co-ruling Consuls that were known to the public, only an Emperor would be known, while keeping the second co-ruler hidden from the public. In the Roman Republic, there were two Consuls who were co-rulers, and as such, had coins minted with their likeness. The idea to change to Emperors instead, was a means in which to have those two rulers, but only allow the public to know who only one of them was. In that way, they were protecting the secret co-ruler or co-emperor from assassination. This would then insure that no matter what, one of the pre-chosen royals would be ruling.
[n] During that period, Exilarchs descended from the Hillelian/Gamalielian leaders of the Pharisees were ruling as the leaders of the Jewish people, and had been doing so since the time after the (Hadrianic) Diaspora of 135 CE/AD. And various negotiations were led by those Jewish representatives in talks with others close to the then Jewish leadership; wherein, individuals such as Bostanai (Bostanai ben Haninai, b. 618, d. 670 CE/AD), and descendants of the Frankish Merovingian Kings were involved to some degree. And, others associated with the family of Bostanai, such as Guillume de Toulouse (aka Guillume de Gellone, of Aquitaine, whose brother Oliba, was a pope [see my other works for more info]). The family of Guillume de Gellone, was of a parallel or co-lateral line of royalty to that of Emperor Charlemagne; both were descendants of Clovis I. Another paper with more information about this should be forthcoming.
The works of Abelard Reuchlin. He wrote several other works besides ‘The True Authorship Of The New Testament’, including one on the subject of Islam. However, his work and studies on that subject could only take him so far.
This is a list of titles of the works of Abelard Reuchlin:
‘The True Authorship of the New Testament’ (second printing, 1986, Abelard Reuchlin)
‘The Pisos’ Further Writings’ (Vol. I & II, Abelard Reuchlin)
‘How Christianity Grew’ (During 96-217 To Near Power In Rome, Abelard Reuchlin)
‘From Ulpian To Constantine’ (Abelard Reuchlin)
‘The Talmudic Responses To Piso’ (Abelard Reuchlin)
‘Islam – Its Koran, Hadith, and its Leadership’ (Abelard Reuchlin)
Note: Other works are known, but may not have been made available to the public before his death. For more information, you may want to try this site: http://www.thepisos.com
See my research papers in Academia(dot)Edu:
The Roman Piso Papers
I’ve also posted many of them on my site in WordPress:
The Piso Project
Our work translated into Spanish:
Our work is also currently being translated into other languages, such as Portuguese and Norwegian.
To get a better idea of how to read the New Testament texts as literature and break down its various elements, I recommend this book; ‘The Bible As Literature: The New Testament’, by Buckner B. Trawick, published as one of the Barnes & Noble College Outline Series.
As for the New Testament that I recommend to people for use in their studies, it is ‘The Interlinear Greek-English New Testament’, by George Ricker Berry, Zondervan Publishing House, Grand Rapids, Michigan.
This Title, ‘When The Real Popes Came To Power’ In Other Languages:
[Afrikaans: ‘Wanneer die werklike Popes aan bewind gekom het’]
[Albanian: ‘Kur Papët Real erdhën në Fuqia’]
[Arabian: عندما جاءت الباباوات الحقيقيون إلى السلطة]
[Armenian: ‘Երբ իրական պապերը եկան իշխանության’]
[Bosnian: ‘Kada su pravi pape došli na vlast’]
[Bulgarian: ‘Когато истинският папи дойде на власт’]
[Chinese: ‘当真正的教皇掌权时 ‘]
[Croatian: ‘Kada su pravi pape došli na vlast’]
[Czech: ‘Když se skuteční papežové dostali k moci’]
[Danish: ‘Når den virkelige paver kom til magten’]
[Dutch: ‘Toen de echte pausen aan de macht kwamen’]
[Esperanto: ‘Kiam La Realaj Papoj Venis Potenci’]
[Estonian: ‘Kui tõelised paavstid tulid võimule.’]
[Filipino: ‘Nang dumating ang mga ang tunay na Papa sa kapangyarihan’]
[Finnish: ‘Kun todellinen paavit tulivat valtaan’]
[French: ‘Quand les vrais papes sont arrivés au pouvoir’]
[Frisian: ‘As The Real Popes Came To Power kaam’]
[Galacian: ‘Cando os papas reais chegaron ao poder’]
[Georgian: ‘როდესაც ნამდვილი პაპები ხელისუფლებაში მოვიდნენ’]
[German: ‘Als die echten Päpste an die Macht kamen’]
[Greek: ‘Όταν οι αληθινοί Πάπες ήρθαν στην εξουσία’]
[Hebrew: ‘כאשר האפיפיורים האמיתיים הגיעו לשלטון ‘]
[Hindi: ‘जब असली Popes सत्ता में आए’]
[Hmong Daw: ‘Thaum twg tus tiag Popes tuaj hwj chim’]
[Hungarian: ‘Amikor az igazi pápák jött hatalomra’]
[Icelandic: ‘Þegar Real popes kom til Power’]
[Indonesian: ‘Ketika Paus nyata datang untuk kekuatan’]
[Irish: ‘Nuair a Tháinig na Peataí Réadúla chun Cumhachta’]
[Italian: ‘Quando i veri Papi giunsero al potere’]
[Korean: ‘진짜 로마 교황은 힘에 올 때’]
[Latin: ‘Cum Verus est Summorum Pontificum Ad potestatem’]
[Latvian: ‘Kad īstie pāvesti ieradās pie varas’]
[Lithuanian: ‘Kai nekilnojamojo popiežių atėjo į valdžią’]
[Luxembourgish: ‘Wann d’Real Päpste zu Muecht kruten’]
[Macedonian: ‘Кога дојде вистинскиот папа на власт’]
[Malay: ‘Bilakah Popes sebenar yang datang kepada kuasa’]
[Maltese: ‘Meta ġew l-Popes reali għall-enerġija’]
[Mongolian: ‘Бодит попүүд хүч чадлаараа ирэхэд’]
[Nepali: ‘जब रियल पपल्स क्याम पावर’]
[Norwegian: ‘Når den virkelige pavene kom til makten’]
[Persian: ‘وقتی آمد پاپ واقعی به قدرت’]
[Polish: ‘Kiedy prawdziwi Papieże doszli do władzy’]
[Portuguese: ‘Quando os verdadeiros papas chegaram ao poder’]
[Romanian: ‘Când adevăraţii papi au venit la putere’]
[Russian: ‘Когда настоящие папы пришли к власти’]
[Samoan: ‘Ina ua oo mai le Popes moni i le mana o’]
[Scots-Gaelic: ‘Nuair a thàinig na Popan Reatha gu Cumhachd’]
[Serbian: ‘Када су прави папе дошли на власт’]
[Sindhi: ‘جڏهن ريئل پوپس ڪاهي طاقت ڪرڻ لاء’]
[Slovak: ‘Keď skutočné pápežovi prišiel k moci’]
[Slovenian: ‘Ko pravi papeži prišli na oblast’]
[Somali: ‘Markay Real Popes Awood u Haysata’]
[Spanish: ‘Cuando los verdaderos papas llegaron al poder’]
[Sundanes: ‘Nalika The Real Popes Datang Ka Daya’]
[Swahili: ‘Wakati mapapa kweli alikuja nguvu’]
[Swedish: ‘När de verkliga påvar kom till makten’]
[Turkish: ‘Gerçek Popes güç geldiğinde’]
[Ukrainian: ‘Коли до влади прийшла справжня Пап’]
[Urdu: ‘جب حقیقی پاپائے روم اقتدار سنبھالا ۔’]
[Uzbek: ‘Haqiqiy Poplar kuchga kirganda’]
[Vietnamese: ‘Khi các giáo hoàng thực sự đến quyền lực’]
[Welch: ‘Pan ddaeth y popes go iawn i rym’]
[Yiddish: ‘ווען די רעאַל פּאָפּעס געקומען צו מאַכט ‘]
[Zulu: ‘Lapho i-Real Popes Ifika Emandleni’]
Attention (Scholars & Researchers):
We must work to change academia. Virtually all ancient history scholars have been wrong, because a) as I have explained in my book ‘Piso Christ’, all of their work is based upon 6 major assumptions, and b) as a result of these assumptions, they view ancient history in the wrong context. And, this is a cycle. They were taught to study the subject incorrectly, and they continue to “teach” others to be wrong. This must stop. Spread this information and help better educate as many people as you can, particularly, those within academia. Please share this information.
Attention Classics & Ancient History ‘Scholars’: Richard Carrier, Marcus Borg, Robert M. Price, Bart Ehrmann, Robert Eisenman, Werner Eck, Anthony Birley, and Joseph Atwill. Particularly, Werner Eck, as I have talked to him a number of times at the urging of Abelard Reuchlin and have sent him my material to study.
Attention New Testament/Biblical ‘Scholars’: Elaine Pagels, John Dominic Crossan, Jonathan Reed, Ched Myers, Bernard Brandon Scott, N.T. Wright, Stanley Hauerwas, Amy-Jill Levine, Taylor Weaver, Richard Hays, David Horrell, Bruce J. Malina, Craig Evans, Craig Keener, Raymond Brown, James D. G. Dunn, Dale Martin, Stanley Stowers, John Barclay, Philip Esler, Garrett Fagan. And Ralph Ellis.
Also, various authors of ancient history and historical themes need to pay attention to this and other works. Particularly, those who have written about a “historical Jesus”. Including Laurence Gardner.
Note: I have personally talked to several of these individuals, as well as friends of theirs who have tried to get through to them about this work. Religious people particularly, strongly reject anything that contradicts their beliefs. Which is why it has been so slow to make any real change within academia, because so many of those who currently comprise it are either religious or biased in some way.
Many problems still exist within Academia. We need to bring Academia into the 21st Century.
Essential Changes To Academia Now Required (Objectivity Is Essential)
The New Classical Scholarship: The New Forensic Study Of History
A Few Words About The Royal Language (A Language Within Language)
The True Context Of Ancient History & The Gordian Emperors
Ancient Alias Names List (2017)
How & Why Ancient Royalty Created Facades & Illusions
[The Effective Creation of an Alternate Version of Reality]
The Roman Piso Papers
Key Words & Related Terms:
Roman coins, denominations, coinage, province, Augustus, Claudius, Nero, Vitellius, Domitian, Trajan, Hadrian, Antoninus Pius, Marcus Aurelius, Septimius Severus, Severus Alexander, Elagabalus, Gordian III, Philip I ‘The Arab’, Claudius II ‘Gothicus’, denari, denarii, denarius, coins, coin, ancient coins, numismatic, celator, ancient mints, silver, gold, copper, aureus, drachm, didrachm, tetradrachm, follis, antoninianus, antoninianii, potin, billon, error, restrike, restrikes, silver wash, silvered, limes, AE, AE3, AR, AV, miliarense, siliqua, centenionalis, argenteus, dupondius, quadrans, cistophorus, sestertius, quinarius, as, As, Semis, triens, sextans, unica, quadrigatus, moneyer, victoriatus, solidus, scripulum.
History, Ancient History, Rome, Ancient Rome, Roman Empire, Roman Emperors, Popes, Papal History, Christianity, History of Christianity, Origin of Christianity, Emperor, Emperors, Roman Catholic History, Holy Roman Empire, Arrius Calpurnius Piso, Roman Piso Family, Ancient Alias Names, Ancient Pen Names, Gordian Emperors, Emperor Antoninus Pius, Arius Antoninus, Marcus Aurelius, Oligarchy, Royal Supremacy, Royal Language, Aliases, Genealogy, Ancient Genealogy, Ancient Genealogies, Historia, Historia Augusta, Flavius Josephus, Pliny The Younger, Suetonius, Tacitus, Plutarch, Hero of Alexandria, Apollonius of Tyana, Philostratus ‘The Athenian’, Philostratus ‘The Younger’, Herodian, Emperor Constantine, Vespasian, Titus, Domitian, Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Lucius Verus, Commodus, Pertinax, Pescennius Niger, Didius Julianus, Clodius Albinus, Septimius Severus, Severus Alexander, Maximinus, Maximus, Probus, Clodius II, Constantius, Constantius Chlorus, Eusebius, Pope Eusebius, Church Father, Early Christianity, Roman Creation of Christianity, Nero, 666, Julius Calpurnius Piso, Julius Piso I, First 10 Popes, Justin Martyr, St. John ‘The Divine’, The Revelation, gospels, The Gospel of Thomas, Gnostic, Gnostic Gospels, Apocryphal, texts, holy, sacred, free, info, sample, paper, papers, research, research paper, Heron, Herod, Agrippa, Philo, Logos, Talmud, Pharisee, pharisees, sect, Cornelius, Theodosius I, Arcadius, Honorius, Byzantine, Byzantium, Constantinople, ancient literature, forensic history, censorship, Medieval, medieval censorship, Inquisition, Crusade, crusades, Church, Church History, comparative, religion, religious, organized religion, Abelard Reuchlin, Professor, Bruno Bauer, James Ballantyne Hannay, Marcus, Antonius, Cleopatra, Julius, Caesar, Caesars, Antonius Primus, Cestius Gallus, Nero, Vitellius, Otho, Licinianus, Frugi, Piso, Julius Servianus, Julius Severus, Julius Constantius I, Galba, New, New Testament, Bible, gospels, epistles, Panegyricus, Timothy, Justinian The Jurist, Proculus Calpurnius Piso, Silanus Piso, Herodes Atticus, ben Pantera, Scribes, genealogy, genealogies, royal, royal line, royal blood, historiography, philosophy, history of, historical Jesus, Dark Ages, Secular Humanism, Atheism, Atheist, Atheists, Historical Anthropology, Anthropology, Anthropology of Religion, Imperial, Imperial Rome, Roma, Classics, Classical Antiquity, Religion as psychological warfare.
Anthropology, genealogical charts, genealogy, archaeology, Origins of Christianity, Holy, Holy Roman Empire, Imperial Rome, Roman Empire, popes, emperor, emperors, King James, Bible, biblical, classics, classical history, historic, Pliny The Elder, Seneca, Aria, Arria, Arria The Younger, Arria The Elder, Arius, Arrius, Fadilla, Arria Fadilla, Arria Antonina, Antonius, Marcus Antonius, Antonius Primus, of Alexandria, of Tyana, of Rome, of Athens, Gnostics, gospel, Gospel of, Thomas, Mary, Magdalan, magi, three, three days, three wise men, rooster, hen, cock, crow, crew, Alexander, Sabina, Gaius Calpurnius Piso, Constantine, Julius Constantius, Constantius Chlorus, Emperor, emperors, Flavia, Flavian, Flavians, Titus, Domitian, Vespasian, Nerva, Augustus, Julius Caesar, Caesar, Tiberius, Gneius Calpurnius Piso, Gaius, Caligula, Claudius, Nero, Galba, Otho, Vitellius, Trajan, Hadrian, Antoninus Pius, Marcus Aurelius, Commodus, Pertinax, Didius Julianus, Clodius Albinus, Septimius Severus, Severus Alexander, Pupienus, Claudius Gothicus, Probus, Gallienus, Tacitus, Florian, Florianus, Balbinus, Postumus, Philip I, Philip II, Pacatian, Jotapian, Aquilia Severa, Annia, Annia Faustina, Julia Soaemias, Julia Maesa, Diadumenian, Elagabalus, Julia Domna, Caracalla, Lucius Verus, Lucilla, Geta, Titiana, Manlia Scantilla, Didia Clara, Pescennius Niger, St. Peter, Saint, Saint Peter, Linus, Gnostic, Apocryphal, Apocryphal New Testament, Gnostic texts, Gnostic Gospels, Gospel of, Ignatius, St. Ignatius, Saint, Saint Ignatius, Pliny, canon bible, canon new testament, extra-biblical, bible, god, gods, inside jokes, jokes in the new testament, emperors in the new testament, Josephus, Inner-Circle, The Oligarchy, Royal Supremacy, the Royal Language, the 1%, royal blood, grail, holy, King James, King James I, of England, Lady Di, Lady Diana, Prince Charles, Queen Elizabeth, Prince William, Prince Harry, royal family, Buckingham palace, earl of, prince of, Wales, the Tower, inherit, religion, religious, religions, dumb-down, apocryphal, duke of, royal title, sir, lord, lady, duchess.