Christianity Was Exposed By Abelard Reuchlin
(Roman Piso, 06-15-2017)
Summary. Because of Reuchlin’s work, we now know a number of things that we had not known before. One, is that what was being written in antiquity, was being tightly controlled by royalty. In fact, the best description for it would be an ‘oligarchy’. This changes the very context in which we should be studying the subject. It means that not only are we examining just who the New Testament authors were, but also those who were writing the histories of the time.
Another thing is that Abelard Reuchlin not only passed along Inner-Circle knowledge that he was told, but he expounded upon it so that it could be more clearly understood by those who otherwise would not. He put forth a viable means in which to examine the texts of the time which includes those who were the witnesses to the creation of Christianity, those Jews who were writing the Talmud.
In addition, he caused others, like me, to examine this further and allowed us to realize just how valuable it is in our studies to look much closer at the involvement of the Jews in trying to prevent the rise of those who would go on to create and promote Christianity. For, the Jews of the time, saw it (Christianity) for what it was truly was, an effort or tactic used by their enemies, as a part of the war that they had been fighting. And therefore, a fraud which needed to be exposed as such.
The cause of the Pharisees and Scribes was for basic human rights, the end of slavery, and the foundation of a new fair democratic government. And, instead of teaching irrational and superstitious religion, they were trying to wean people off of that and replace it with sound, rational, practical, ethical reasoning.
While Christianity, by contrast, was created to do the opposite of that. And that is because some greedy Roman rulers whose lives of luxury would be drastically changed, if the Pharisees and Scribes accomplished their goals for the people. Of course, to get people to believe in Christianity, the creators of Christianity had to make it appear to be something ‘good’, in much the same way that trappers set traps for dumb animals. Which, is exactly how those ancient royal rulers (the less than 1% of the time) saw non-royals, as nothing more than their own chattel which was there for no other reason than their own use for whatever purposes that they saw fit. Thus, Christianity was created as a means for them to better secure, control and manipulate the people, that they saw as their own sheep or chattel.
This paper highlights the course that Abelard Reuchlin had taken in order to reach the conclusions that he was able to in order to advance our understanding of what the world was really like during the time in which the New Testament was being written and just who had motive to do so. And, his work also reminds us that we must consider all of the evidence of the time (that means the Jewish texts, the Jews of the time, and the Jewish war that was involved in the creation of Christianity).
Reuchlin’s work underscores our need to better understand what we study in the correct context in order to find out just who was actually writing at the time, and why. It is because of Abelard Reuchlin’s work (and that of others, or course), that my own work was made more complete. I urge everyone to read and learn from the work that Reuchlin had devoted his life to in order that future generations could have that extremely important information.
For those who do not know it, Abelard Reuchlin wrote a work titled ‘The True Authorship of the New Testament’. In that work, he, for the very first time ever, gave the true names the authors of the New Testament books. He was certain of it. And so are those who have went on to research the subject in the way that he did. [I] But, just how was he able to do it when so many others had failed?
Perhaps the most impressive thing to me is that though he had made the discoveries that he did, he did not seek to use it in order to manipulate people (like others who used the knowledge to bilk believers). Nor did he keep that information to himself. Instead, he realized how important it was to share the information. And so, he presented it in a very scholarly and condensed way, and offered it to the public at next to his cost (plus postage) to produce it in a form that could be sent directly to people by snail-mail. He first offered this information to the public in 1979, by offering it in various publications. [II]
Though Reuchlin was not seeking fame or fortune from his discoveries, he did receive an amount of recognition by a community of intelligent people who could appreciate his work and efforts. Though many of those who knew of and appreciated his work were those who are sometimes termed “ordinary people,” he was, indeed, celebrated to some extent by a few Inner-Circle members. Ironically, it appeared that among those who expressed the most appreciation for his work were ex-Catholics.
As you may have guessed, if you did not know it already, Abelard Reuchlin has since passed away. But his work lives on, and he is remembered quite fondly by those who knew and loved both him and his work. He was a very special individual, with great talents. He literally lived his life in service to Humanity. And, he continued to try to give more information about the subject that he knew so well, virtually until the end of his life. So, what I will try to give you here is what I know about just how he had managed to find out what he did. [III]
Abelard Reuchlin grew up a practicing Jew, and therefore, knew Hebrew, Aramaic and Yiddish. He had a great sense of humor and was very creative. He would often make up songs and jokes, particularly on the subject of those who had created Christianity. And, I had the great honor and pleasure of his having had shared those with me. I particularly enjoyed when he would sing one of his songs to me or tell me one of his original jokes about the Pisos. [IV]
He (Reuchlin), knew that one day, once what he had discovered (or uncovered) becomes known to everyone, it would mean the end of what so many Jews in the First and Second Centuries (and later) had died trying to prevent (i.e., Christianity). And, that it will be a time of great celebration, of “liberation” for Humanity from the yoke of they knew to be a huge lie and fraud. He looked forward to a time when the world would one day know about the war that was fought on behalf of Humanity by the Jews, in a very long, and yet virtually unknown war. [V]
As I had said above, Reuchlin knew Hebrew, Aramaic, and Yiddish. And, as many of the Jews from his generation, he knew some German as well. However, he also knew Latin and Greek. So, he was able to read primary source documents (ancient texts) in their original language. When he and I had worked together on various items regarding this subject matter, we would consult each other and share our work and information with each other. I asked him a lot of questions, and thus, learned quite a lot from him. With his knowledge of these languages, he was able to research what most people could not. [VI]
What both he and I knew to begin with is that there are those out there who know the truth about Christianity, but who have kept that information to themselves. They are those whom we call ‘Inner-Circle’ members. Reuchlin did not just stumble across what he needed to know in order to find out what he did. He had an Inner-Circle member confide in him with information that lifted the veil from his eyes, and, which gave him a push in the right direction. And that information was that Romans had created Christianity (and, pointed him towards the Pisos). Thus, he was able to build himself a foundation of knowledge in which to work from, from the work of those who had previously investigated the Roman creation of Christianity. [VII]
He investigated the work of those who had already reached the conclusion of a Roman authorship for the New Testament texts. He examined the work of Professor Bruno Bauer of the University of Berlin, who wrote several books regarding the origins of the gospels, including ‘Chrestus Und Die Kaiseren’ (1877, Berlin). [VIII]
One of the strongest connections to a Roman link to the gospels found by Bauer is that of a link between the Christian ideology and “philosophy” represented in the gospels and that of Roman Stoicism; particularly, that of the Roman Rhetorician, Seneca. He found that the ideological concepts presented in Seneca’s literary work virtually mirrored that which is found in the gospels. Since Seneca wrote slightly earlier than the gospels were written in their finished form (the earliest being ‘Mark’ circa 70 CE), it may be better stated that it is the gospels which reflect the ideology presented by Seneca. [IX]
When scholars critical of Christianity began to investigate as Professor Bauer did, they began to finally better date the New Testament texts to the time in which they are actually written, and/or when they were first completed in their finished form. Also, Professor Bauer was one of the first to discover that the gospel of Mark was the first or earliest of the synoptic gospels. [X]
Thus, with the work of Professor Bauer, Reuchlin would understand how Bauer was able to uncover the things that he had uncovered. Another researcher whose work Reuchlin examined was James Ballantine Hannay, of Oxford. Hannay had helped to prepare and develop the ‘Encyclopedia Biblica’, which was published by Oxford University, circa 1900-1910. This encyclopedia exposed the true “bawdy” nature of various religions, including Christianity, by giving the true meaning of the words used by the authors of religious texts. [XI]
So, Reuchlin had the work of both Bauer and Hannay to work from. And, Hannay, like Bauer, also found many Roman connections to the gospels and other New Testament texts. Now, there were these two exceptional scholars, and both agreed upon a Roman authorship for the New Testament. But neither was able to identify the actual authors of the New Testament texts beyond a connection to Seneca, Roman stoicism and bawdy Roman language used within the New Testament (i.e. inside jokes, and therefore, evidence of non-holy authorship). [XII]
Abelard Reuchlin knew just who the scholars were during the time in which he began his studies. That is, just who were known as being the most knowledgeable regarding the Roman Empire during the time in which Christianity was created. And so, he consulted their work. Among these, was Sir Ronald Syme. Syme wrote books, but he was mainly known within academia for his research papers, which were generally published within academic journals and periodicals (JRS, etc.). [XIII]
Another thing that I should say is that Reuchlin was already familiar with the “classics”. That is, he had built himself a library containing books of classical (ancient) texts, particularly, those which were made available by Harvard University (the Loeb Classical Library editions). Those books were published so that they gave both the original language of the texts as well as a direct translation for each page. Meaning, that these books were published specifically for scholars and researchers, so as to give easy access to what may be termed (in most cases), primary source documents in the original language. And, as stated before, Reuchlin was able to read those texts in their original language. [XIV]
Remember I said that Reuchlin had been told some information that would help him? He had expressed an interest in finding out the truth about Christianity and often spoke to Rabbis about the subject. Today, there are a few Rabbis who are Inner-Circle members (they know the subject, at least to some extent). In earlier times, there were several Rabbis who were Inner-Circle (up until about the 1500s). Many of those were either killed or died off without spreading their knowledge (Crusades, Inquisitions, etc.). Reuchlin actively sought out others to help answer some of his questions. He discovered that there were certain quotes and lines in literature which Inner-Circle authors would know and use, which had apparent special meanings. Some were by Shakespeare, and some were by other I.C. authors. [XV]
He knew this too, that there were Inner-Circle Jews during the First and Second Centuries, and beyond. Thus, he had the Talmud and other Jewish commentaries to consult. And, the Jews of the time in which Christianity was created, were witnesses to its creation. So, it made sense that they would try to let others know what they knew, and the way in which to do that was to put that information in the Talmud. This was one of the main reasons for hatred towards the Jews down through the centuries. Since they had censorship imposed upon them, they were not allowed to write about what they knew in any obvious fashion. Which is why they had to do the best that they could in such circumstances. [XVI]
I once asked Reuchlin, “when was it that you first discovered that the Piso family were the authors of the New Testament?” He told me that he began to examine the Pisos as the authors in 1973. He then examined the Pisos and their relatives, mainly from articles by Professor Syme, before 1973. But he then had to focus upon finding which of them were the authors of which NT book. And, it took him from that time, until 1979 to put the information that he had discovered into a form which he could make available to the public. He said that Professor Syme was an Inner-Circle member, but that Syme did not dare write about what he knew publicly (as it would ruin his career). [XVII]
Though Reuchlin now had a great deal of information in which to work with (including the Talmud, for comments from Jews who were witnesses to the creation of Christianity), he was only one person and sought the help and information of others as well. He realized that in order to do the work that he did, that it had consumed a substantial portion of his life in the process. But to him, it was a duty that he knew he had to do. You see, both he and I realized that there were thousands of people who had gave their lives in order to try to prevent Christianity from becoming a reality. And virtually no one knew that, or who these people were. To us, it was important to let the world know this. [XVIII]
Reuchlin had become aware of a book that would greatly help him in his examination of the Talmud. That book, which he shared with me, is ‘Jewish Expressions On Jesus’ (An Anthology, KTAV Publishing House Inc., New York, 1977). It had been published at various times (even before 1977). It is this book, that gives so many instances of individuals connected to Christianity being mentioned in the Talmud. And, most importantly, as Reuchlin had discovered, the authors who were Inner-Circle, were using and being referred to through the use of alternate names (aliases or pen names). [XIX]
Because a) Reuchlin had observed the use of alias names being used to hide or disguise the true names and identities of those involved in the creation of Christianity in the other ancient texts of the time – he b) readily understood the same thing being used in the Talmud. And c), he saw it as verification of what he had already found. [XX]
Piecing everything he found together, he realized that certain individuals and families were involved in not only the creation of Christianity, but also in all other material being written for publication within the Roman Empire. Even the Jews were restricted on what they were able to write while residing under the rule of others. It was the Pisos and their royal cousins (including the Flavians) who were ruling the Roman Empire after having gotten rid of Nero and others (e.g., Galba, Otho and Vitellius). But while the Pisos enjoyed life with Vespasian and Titus ruling, that ended (for a while) when Domitian became emperor. They eventually had him (Domitian) assassinated, and installed Nerva. From then on, they were virtually in control of the Roman Empire once again. [XXI]
Some people ask, how can I be sure that what he has said is true? I usually inform them of the use of aliases and pen names used by both the authors and those whom they were writing about (because, all of them were royalty and wanted their identities concealed during their own lifetime). I tell them what had convinced me of what Reuchlin was saying about the authors not being who they said they were, and that is in giving an example that they can check on themselves. Perhaps the easiest is that of Tacitus as Neratius Priscus. See my papers on the subject. [XXII]
So, why hasn’t Reuchlin’s work been accepted by some people? [a] The subject matter when studied as it should be is complex and quite involved; many people do not have the time and/or inclination, or even ability, to do it right. [b] It contradicts the belief of some people. Thus, they reject it for that reason and that reason only. [c] Some people do not like certain aspects of Reuchlin’s work; such as his use of the word/term ‘code’ and/or the fact that he used number systems (alpha-numerics). But, then many people do not realize that ancient languages were alpha-numeric. That is, letters had numeric value and were used as such routinely in ancient times.
[d] Academia was never established to get at the truth. And that still is not its purpose, though some may like to think so. If that were the case, biased or religious people would not be allowed to be a part of it, as objectivity is necessary to get at the truth. The truth is that current academia is about generating money for those making money from it. [e] Academia, in terms of areas such as history and religion, teach assumptions as the basis for students to build upon (see my Six Major Assumptions of Academia, found in my book ‘Piso Christ’). [f] Those who are a part of academia and who have earned degrees, teach, etc., in the areas of history and/or religion see no gain for themselves if what they were taught is incorrect. Their degrees would virtually be worthless. Their degrees would become something akin to a certification of gullibility. And, they would be embarrassed by the reality of the situation.
[g] And still others, would not accept his work for whatever personal reasons of their own (laziness, etc.). [h] Some think that Reuchlin did not give enough information so as to allow the to get up to speed, or attain the level of knowledge that Reuchlin himself, did. That is, even though he told what he had found, he didn’t provide enough information so as to allow most readers of his material to get to that level as well. Remember, he had to learn several languages and devote a large portion of his life to this. You, if you want to understand this as he did, must also do your work as he did. Not everyone is suited to be a scholar of this level. That is the simple reality that must be faced.
One thing is certain. Reuchlin’s work is extremely important and remains an essential source of information for anyone researching the origins of Christianity. In my informed opinion, Abelard Reuchlin did indeed expose Christianity. And, the work done by him and others will be added to and become known to more and more people as time goes on. As Reuchlin used to say to me, “keep up the good work, and be well.” Abelard Reuchlin passed away in the first half of 2015.
[I] In ‘The True Authorship of the New Testament’, Reuchlin also gives the dates in which the New Testament texts were written along with their authors. He also gives the history of the time which parallels the time in which those books were written.
[II] He saw his work as a service to Humanity. He knew that eventually everyone would know what he discovered, and that they would know that it was his work that directly aided in exposing the truth and true nature of both the creation of Christianity, but also of the history of the time as well. He had hoped to have been around to see it. Unfortunately, despite having worked very hard to get the work out to people, he passed away before being able to see that happen. He had did interviews with radio stations (talk shows), made videos, and placed ads in magazines like ‘The Humanist’, ‘The Progressive’, ‘The Nation’ and ‘The Atlantic’.
[III] He wrote several other works after having written ‘The True Authorship’. ‘Inner-Circle’ members are those who in one way or another, knew the truth about the creation of Christianity. Some were born into families who passed the knowledge on within their family, but kept that knowledge from everyone else. Others, learned about it from others who had figured it out or had been told of it. There are, and have been, many ‘Inner-Circle’ authors. Most have only hinted at what they knew.
[IV] Reuchlin knew several languages and would help me with Hebrew, Aramaic and some Yiddish. One such poem/song which he wrote and would sing was called ‘The Night Before Piso’.
[V] Most historians still do not realize that it was one long war. They still think of the Jews of the time in the generic sense and instead of seeing the larger picture as an actual war, they only see intermittent “revolts.” And this is because so many scholars today have tunnel-vision, and basically either ignore the Jews of the time (their Talmud and role in history), or they do not go far enough in learning about them and their sects. They tend to read on a superficial level (simply reading and believing in virtually the same way as Christian believers believe the New Testament, instead of working to find out just who the authors actually were before believing them), and focus nearly entirely upon the Roman authors who were lying bold-faced to them.
[VI] We found it essential to know many ancient languages in order to obtain an accurate overview of ancient history and religion. And, to be informed of the research of others in more modern times, it is necessary to know languages other than English also. Many of those who are known of as scholars today, know perhaps Latin and some Greek, in addition to their own native language and maybe another modern language. That is not at all what is required to reach the level of scholarship which Reuchlin and a few others have attained. They must be able to read for themselves all primary sources in the original languages in those times. And that includes the records of the Jews and others.
[VII] I, and others were told by Reuchlin who that individual was. However, I do not remember who that I.C. member was. I did actually write it down, but many of my notes were destroyed. So, I don’t know if I will ever be able to find that information. Those who had investigated the Roman creation of Christianity prior to Abelard Reuchlin were Prof. Bruno Bauer, and James Ballantyne Hannay, among others.
[VIII] ‘Chrestus Und Die Kaiseren’ by Prof. Bruno Bauer, 1877, Berlin. It was translated into other languages, including English. Originally written in ‘Old German’. I had written a translation of it years ago, but it appears that it was destroyed along with other of my notes, papers and manuscripts. Bauer also wrote several other books on related subjects.
[IX] He recognized and identified Seneca’s and the Roman stoicism (philosophy) as a main element within the gospels. Which is something not derived from those living in or around Judea, but patently, Roman. In fact, there are instances within the NT texts that nearly mirror Seneca’s statements verbatim. If not always by exact word, then certainly, by meaning. He also noticed a correlation between the various writers of the time and the NT texts, including Tacitus, Suetonius’ ‘The Twelve Caesars’ biographies of the first 12 Roman Emperors, Pliny The Younger and others. He even consulted the Talmud to some degree. See my paper, ‘Seneca, Christianity, And The Caesars’.
Seneca, Christianity, And The Caesars
[X] H.J. Holtzmann (Heinrich Julius), established that Mark was the earliest gospel, and the existence of the ‘Q’ (“Quella”) document.
[XI] The ‘Encyclopedia Biblica’ appears to have been suppressed and has become a rare publication. A copy of it may still exist at Oxford University.
[XII] It is truly amazing just what Prof. Bruno Bauer had discovered. He even understood that there was a “closed environment” in place, not only at the time in which the NT was being written, but also that it was still in effect during his time. And, though James Ballantyne Hannay (‘The Rise, Decline And Fall Of The Roman Religion’, published posthumously in 1925) did not get everything correct, he did have a great knowledge of the words that were being used in religion – and particularly, in Christian texts. He even illustrates their origin and gives his sources. Also, see my book, ‘Piso Christ’ for examples of what the bawdy Roman authors actually wrote into the New Testament texts.
Piso Christ: What Is The Book About?
Piso Christ: The Roman Piso Family Created Christianity.
[XIII] Reuchlin cites various papers in ‘The True Authorship of the New Testament’, and says that “The biographical index at the end of Pliny’s letters is very helpful in interrelating, and hence deciphering, the various names and identities.” Syme’s work helps as well. Regarding those mentioned by Pliny (Pliny The Younger), see Syme’s ‘People In Pliny’, JRS. And the Flavian connection is virtually deduced for us in ‘Some Flavian Connections’, Gavin Townend, Journal of Roman Studies, LI. 54, 62, 1961.
[XIV] Reuchlin’s ability to read and study in several languages helped immensely; as well as the carefully selected library that he had built for himself. To build a set covering the classics of the 1st and 2nd Centuries alone, in the Loeb Classical Library edition series would be quite costly. But, one can read them at many local college or university libraries. It is not likely that you would find them at regular public libraries.
[XV] This, to me at least, is one of the best explanations for there having been an “oral tradition”. That is, Rabbis and Inner-Circle Jews could pass along knowledge that they could not write down (as they were forbidden to do so under penalty of death by those who were ruling over them). They could read and explain what they read and what it actually meant, so that Inner-Circle Jews could keep that information alive, even though they could not write it down in commentaries, etc. The ‘Inner-Circle’ are those who know the true context of ancient history and the truth about the creation of Christianity. Mainly, they are either the descendants of those who created Christianity or descendants of the Jews who fought against it. In general, those of the oligarchy (both now and then) are those referred to as ‘Inner-Circle’.
The Oligarchy (or 1%) uses organized religion to dumb-down the masses, so that they are easier to control and manipulate. Napoleon: “Religion is excellent stuff for keeping common people quiet. Religion is what keeps the poor from murdering the rich.” We need to enact new laws that protect US from the 1%. Did you know that most (if not all) of those who comprise the Oligarchy or 1% today are direct descendants of Pope Alexander VI? And are, of course, of royal blood.
Wealth Inequity Because Of The Oligarchy
Understanding The Oligarchy
Understanding The Oligarchy
Oligarchy And Ancient Genealogies
Napoleon Bonaparte & The Holy Roman Empire
The Audacity Of King James (Part I)
Pope Alexander VI (Rodrigo Borgia), leader of the notorious Borgia papal crime family (Pope from 1492-1503). The likeness of ‘Jesus’ that most Christian believers have thought to be that of Christ since the early 1500s was actually that of Cesare Borgia (born 1475, died 1507), Pope Alexander VI’s son.
Pope Alexander VI (his ancestors & descendants)
[XVI] See my paper, ‘The Medieval Censorship Of The Talmud’, in Academia(dot)Edu.
The Medieval Censorship Of The Talmud
[XVII] From what I know about Inner-Circle members and Syme’s work, and because his works helps other I.C. members, I’d have to agree with Reuchlin. He knew a great deal about the Pisos, and their royal relatives. He saw and understood many of the same things that Reuchlin and I have observed in the texts of that time.
Sir Ronald Syme & Abelard Reuchlin (Rome & Christianity)
[XVIII] This is why it is important to understand that a long, all-out war had been going on, and not simply a few Jewish ‘revolts’. The main of the war lasted from about 135 BCE until the Diaspora of 135 CE.
[XIX] Careful reading of the Talmud allows us to better understand the part played by individual Jewish leaders in the war that led up to the Diaspora in 135 CE. Of course, all of the names of all of the Jews who died in that long war will never be known. But many of the names of the Jewish leaders of the time who died fighting in that war have been preserved.
[XX] The Jewish leadership were in charge of what went into the Talmud. However, they were writing while living under the rule of royals who imposed censorship upon them. So, in order to say things in the Talmud which would eventually help us to find out the truth about Christianity, they had to do so by using alternative names or nicknames for some of the individuals that they were trying to describe.
Arrius Calpurnius Piso (aka the NT Jesus) In The Talmud
Pliny The Younger (aka the NT Paul) In The Talmud
[XXI] The descendants and royal relatives of the Pisos and Flavians became the rulers of the Roman Empire, once Domitian was assassinated. Thus, establishing a new oligarchy tracing its ancestry back to common ancestry.
Arrius Piso And The Emperor Domitian
The True Context Of Ancient History & The Gordian Emperors
All Roman Emperors From Antoninus Pius On Were Descended From Piso Family Of Rome
[XXII] See my papers, ‘Discovering Tacitus As Neratius Priscus’ and ‘The Descent Of Emperor Tacitus From Historian Tacitus’, and others posted in Academia(dot)Edu.
Discovering Tacitus As Neratius Priscus
Descent Of Emperor Tacitus From Historian Tacitus
The New Classical Scholarship: The New Forensic Study Of History
Regarding Joseph Atwill’s Titus
A Few Words About The Royal Language
[NOTE: If for some reason a link does not work, you should be able to find the paper you are looking for at either of these links:
The Roman Piso Papers
The Piso Project (on WordPress)
Also, if a link does not work, try to copy & paste the URL into your browser and hit ‘Enter’. Or simply to a search engine search using the paper title.
Title in other languages:
[Albanian: ‘Krishtërimi u ekspozua nga Abelard Reuchlin’]
[Arabian: ‘تعرضت المسيحية من قبل أبيلارد ريوشلين’]
[Armenian: ‘Քրիստոնեությունը բացահայտվեց Աբելարդ Ռեչլինի կողմից’]
[Bosnian: ‘Hrišćanstvo je izložio Abelard Reuchlin’]
[Chinese (Traditional): ‘基督教被Abelard Reuchlin暴露’]
[Croatian: ‘Kršćanstvo je izložio Abelard Reuchlin’]
[Czech: ‘Křesťanství odhalil Abelard Reuchlin’]
[Danish: ‘Kristendommen blev udsat af Abelard Reuchlin’]
[Dutch: ‘Het christendom werd blootgesteld door Abelard Reuchlin’]
[Esperanto: ‘Kristanismo estis elmontrita Per Abelard Reuchlin’]
[Estonian: ‘Abelard Reuchlinit tabas kristlus’]
[Filipino: ‘Ang Kristiyanismo ay Naipahayag Ni Abelard Reuchlin’]
[Finnish: ‘Abelard Reuchlin esitteli kristinuskon’]
[French: ‘Le christianisme a été exposé par Abelard Reuchlin’]
[German: ‘Das Christentum wurde von Abaelard Reuchlin ausgesetzt’]
[Greek: ‘Ο Χριστιανισμός εκτέθηκε από τον Abelard Reuchlin’]
[Hebrew: ‘הנצרות נחשפה על ידי Abelard Reuchlin’]
[Hungarian: ‘A kereszténységet Abelard Reuchlin vette fel’]
[Italian: ‘Il cristianesimo è stato esposto da Abelard Reuchlin’]
[Japanese: ‘キリスト教はAbelard Reuchlinによって公開されました’]
[Latin: ‘Christianismus manifestabatur subito per Reuchlin’]
[Latvian: ‘Kristietība tika atklāta Abelard Reuchlin’]
[Lithuanian: ‘Abelardas Reuchlinas apstojo krikščionybę’]
[Norwegian: ‘Kristendommen ble utsatt av Abelard Reuchlin’]
[Persian: ‘مسیحیت توسط آبراهه راولز بازنشسته شد’]
[Polish: ‘Chrześcijaństwo zostało wystawione przez Abelarda Reuchlina’]
[Portuguese: ‘O cristianismo foi exposto por Abelard Reuchlin’]
[Romanian: ‘Creștinismul a fost expus de Abelard Reuchlin’]
[Russian: ‘Христианство было открыто Абеляром Рейхлином’]
[Serbian: ‘Хришћанство је изложио Абелард Реуцхлин’]
[Sindhi: ‘عیسائیت ابیلر Reuchlin کی طرف سے پیش کیا گیا تھا’]
[Slovak: ‘Kresťanstvo bolo vystavené Abelardom Reuchlinom’]
[Slovenian: ‘Krščanstvo je pokazal Abelard Reuchlin’]
[Spanish: ‘El cristianismo fue expuesto por Abelard Reuchlin’]
[Swahili: ‘Ukristo ulionyeshwa na Abelard Reuchlin’]
[Swedish: ‘Kristendomen var utsatt av Abelard Reuchlin’]
[Turkish: ‘Hristiyanlık, Abelard Reuchlin tarafından açığa vuruldu’]
[Ukrainian: ‘Християнство було розкрито Абеляром Реухліном’]
[Urdu: ‘عیسائیت ابیلر راچینن کی طرف سے عائد کیا گیا تھا’]
[Zulu: ‘UbuKristu Buchazwa Ngu-Abelard Reuchlin’]
Attention (Scholars & Researchers):
We must work to change academia. Virtually all ancient history scholars have been wrong, because a) as I have explained in my book ‘Piso Christ’, all of their work is based upon 6 major assumptions, and b) as a result of these assumptions, they view ancient history in the wrong context. And, this is a cycle. They were taught to study the subject incorrectly, and they continue to “teach” others to be wrong. This must stop. Spread this information and help better educate as many people as you can, particularly, those within academia. Please share this information.
Attention Classics & Ancient History ‘Scholars’: Richard Carrier, Marcus Borg, Robert M. Price, Bart Ehrmann, Robert Eisenman, Werner Eck, Anthony Birley. Particularly, Werner Eck, as I have talked to him a number of times at the urging of Abelard Reuchlin and have sent him my material to study.
Attention New Testament/Biblical ‘Scholars’: Elaine Pagels, John Dominic Crossan, Jonathan Reed, Ched Myers, Bernard Brandon Scott, N.T. Wright, Stanley Hauerwas, Amy-Jill Levine, Taylor Weaver, Richard Hays, David Horrell, Bruce J. Malina, Craig Evans, Craig Keener, Raymond Brown, James D. G. Dunn, Dale Martin, Stanley Stowers, John Barclay, Philip Esler, Garrett Fagan.
Note: I have personally talked to several of these individuals, as well as friends of theirs who have tried to get through to them about this work. Religious people particularly, strongly reject anything that contradicts their beliefs. Which is why it has been so slow to make any real change within academia, because so many of those who currently comprise it are either religious or biased in some way.
Many problems still exist within Academia. We need to bring Academia into the 21st Century.
Essential Changes To Academia Now Required (Objectivity Is Essential)
The New Classical Scholarship: The New Forensic Study Of History
A Few Words About The Royal Language (A Language Within Language)
The True Context Of Ancient History & The Gordian Emperors
Ancient Alias Names List (2017)
How & Why Ancient Royalty Created Facades & Illusions
[The Effective Creation of an Alternate Version of Reality]
Related Papers can be found here:
The Roman Piso Papers
Key Words & Terms)
Roman coins, denominations, coinage, province, Augustus, Claudius, Nero, Vitellius, Domitian, Trajan, Hadrian, Antoninus Pius, Marcus Aurelius, Septimius Severus, Severus Alexander, Elagabalus, Gordian III, Philip I ‘The Arab’, Claudius II ‘Gothicus’, denari, denarii, denarius, coins, coin, ancient coins, numismatic, celator, ancient mints, silver, gold, copper, aureus, drachm, didrachm, tetradrachm, follis, antoninianus, antoninianii, potin, billon, error, restrike, restrikes, silver wash, silvered, limes, AE, AE3, AR, AV, miliarense, siliqua, centenionalis, argenteus, dupondius, quadrans, cistophorus, sestertius, quinarius, as, As, Semis, triens, sextans, unica, quadrigatus, moneyer, victoriatus, solidus, scripulum.
History, Ancient History, Rome, Ancient Rome, Roman Empire, Roman Emperors, Popes, Papal History, Christianity, History of Christianity, Origin of Christianity, Emperor, Emperors, Roman Catholic History, Holy Roman Empire, Arrius Calpurnius Piso, Roman Piso Family, Ancient Alias Names, Ancient Pen Names, Gordian Emperors, Emperor Antoninus Pius, Arius Antoninus, Marcus Aurelius, Oligarchy, Royal Supremacy, Royal Language, Aliases, Genealogy, Ancient Genealogy, Ancient Genealogies, Historia, Historia Augusta, Flavius Josephus, Pliny The Younger, Suetonius, Tacitus, Plutarch, Hero of Alexandria, Apollonius of Tyana, Philostratus ‘The Athenian’, Philostratus ‘The Younger’, Herodian, Emperor Constantine, Vespasian, Titus, Domitian, Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Lucius Verus, Commodus, Pertinax, Pescennius Niger, Didius Julianus, Clodius Albinus, Septimius Severus, Severus Alexander, Maximinus, Maximus, Probus, Clodius II, Constantius, Constantius Chlorus, Eusebius, Pope Eusebius, Church Father, Early Christianity, Roman Creation of Christianity, Nero, 666, Julius Calpurnius Piso, Julius Piso I, First 10 Popes, Justin Martyr, St. John ‘The Divine’, The Revelation, gospels, The Gospel of Thomas, Gnostic, Gnostic Gospels, Apocryphal, texts, holy, sacred, free, info, sample, paper, papers, research, research paper, Heron, Herod, Agrippa, Philo, Logos, Talmud, Pharisee, pharisees, sect, Cornelius, Theodosius I, Arcadius, Honorius, Byzantine, Byzantium, Constantinople, ancient literature, forensic history, censorship, Medieval, medieval censorship, Inquisition, Crusade, crusades, Church, Church History, comparative, religion, religious, organized religion, Abelard Reuchlin, Professor, Bruno Bauer, James Ballantyne Hannay, Marcus, Antonius, Cleopatra, Julius, Caesar, Caesars, Antonius Primus, Cestius Gallus, Nero, Vitellius, Otho, Licinianus, Frugi, Piso, Julius Servianus, Julius Severus, Julius Constantius I, Galba, New, New Testament, Bible, gospels, epistles, Panegyricus, Timothy, Justinian The Jurist, Proculus Calpurnius Piso, Silanus Piso, Herodes Atticus, ben Pantera, Scribes, genealogy, genealogies, royal, royal line, royal blood, historiography, philosophy, history of, historical Jesus, Dark Ages, Secular Humanism, Atheism, Atheist, Atheists, Historical Anthropology, Anthropology, Anthropology of Religion, Imperial, Imperial Rome, Roma, Classics, Classical Antiquity, Religion as psychological warfare.
Anthropology, genealogical charts, genealogy, archaeology, Origins of Christianity, Holy, Holy Roman Empire, Imperial Rome, Roman Empire, popes, emperor, emperors, King James, Bible, biblical, classics, classical history, historic, Pliny The Elder, Seneca, Aria, Arria, Arria The Younger, Arria The Elder, Arius, Arrius, Fadilla, Arria Fadilla, Arria Antonina, Antonius, Marcus Antonius, Antonius Primus, of Alexandria, of Tyana, of Rome, of Athens, Gnostics, gospel, Gospel of, Thomas, Mary, Magdalan, magi, three, three days, three wise men, rooster, hen, cock, crow, crew, Alexander, Sabina, Gaius Calpurnius Piso, Constantine, Julius Constantius, Constantius Chlorus, Emperor, emperors, Flavia, Flavian, Flavians, Titus, Domitian, Vespasian, Nerva, Augustus, Julius Caesar, Caesar, Tiberius, Gneius Calpurnius Piso, Gaius, Caligula, Claudius, Nero, Galba, Otho, Vitellius, Trajan, Hadrian, Antoninus Pius, Marcus Aurelius, Commodus, Pertinax, Didius Julianus, Clodius Albinus, Septimius Severus, Severus Alexander, Pupienus, Claudius Gothicus, Probus, Gallienus, Tacitus, Florian, Florianus, Balbinus, Postumus, Philip I, Philip II, Pacatian, Jotapian, Aquilia Severa, Annia, Annia Faustina, Julia Soaemias, Julia Maesa, Diadumenian, Elagabalus, Julia Domna, Caracalla, Lucius Verus, Lucilla, Geta, Titiana, Manlia Scantilla, Didia Clara, Pescennius Niger, St. Peter, Saint, Saint Peter, Linus.